Patient and public attitudes to and awareness of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review with thematic and narrative syntheses
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arwen Pieterse|
|22 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maritta Välimäki|
|12 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kirsty Loudon|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arwen Pieterse|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|15 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-321|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.