Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Patient and public attitudes to and awareness of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review with thematic and narrative syntheses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Dec 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arwen Pieterse
22 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maritta Välimäki
12 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kirsty Loudon
Resubmission - Version 5
12 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arwen Pieterse
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-321

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.