Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of couples & main outcomes of couple HIV testing

From: Couple experiences of provider-initiated couple HIV testing in an antenatal clinic in Lusaka, Zambia: lessons for policy and practice

Age of marital partners (in year)

Length of marriage (in years/months)

Couple-HIV Status

Main outcome of CVCT

Couple 1: Man 32 yrs; woman 28 yrs

4 yrs

Concordant couple

Supportive marriage; protectivesex; woman assertive on condoms. Man provides treatment support.

Couple 2: Man 32 yrs; Woman 27 years

4.6 yrs

Concordant couple

CVCT strengthened marital bond; man ‘sticks’ to his wife; alternate use of condoms.

Couple 3: Man 36 yrs; Woman 29 years

8 yrs

Concordant couple

Man refuses to use condoms; threatens wife with divorce; wife economically dependent on spouse.

Couple 4: Man 26 yrs; Woman 22 years

3.8 yrs

Concordant couple

Man felt “trapped” to test; CVCT empowered wife to form new treatment support social networks.

Couple 5: Man 34 yrs; Woman 26 years

2.6 yrs

Concordant couple

Initial cessation of sex after CVCT. Safe sex still a challenge. However, CVCT enabled woman create supportive social support networks.

Couple 6: Man 23 yrs; Woman 20 years

2.1 yrs

Concordant couple

Supportive couple; young couple struggling to balance between Protect tion & procreation.

Couple 7: Man 34 yrs; Woman 26 years

4.9 yrs

Concordant couple

Man felt “trapped” to test; but encourages wife to attend support group meetings.

Couple 8: Man 26 yrs; Woman 22 years

4 yrs

Discordant couple

Supportive couple; reproductive (woman HIV-) aspirations undermine safe sex.

Couple 9: Man 28 yrs; Woman 23 years

2.6 yrs

Discordant couple

Strong bond but man’s desire for (woman HIV-) sexual intimacy & child bearing affects safe sex practice.

Couple 10: Man 46 yrs; Woman 29 years

5.7 yrs

Discordant couple

Man refuses safe sex; he wants (woman HIV-) male child; HIV-negative woman fears infection & threatens divorce.