Skip to main content

Table 3 Variables for per- and post-matched samples for the intervention and comparison group

From: Application of propensity scores to estimate the association between government subsidy and injection use in primary health care institutions in China

 

Pre-PSM approach

Post-PSM approach

Control group

Intervention group

P

Control group

Intervention group

P

Province

Hubei

14(22.22)

7(11.11)

0.06

5(14.70)

5(14.70)

0.96a

Liaoning

10(15.87)

11(17.46)

 

5(14.70)

4(11.80)

 

Shandong

8(12.70)

13(20.63)

 

7(20.60)

6(17.60)

 

Shanxi

13(20.63)

8(12.70)

 

3(8.80)

6(17.60)

 

Shaanxi

5(7.94)

16(25.40)

 

4(11.80)

4(11.80)

 

Sichuan

11(17.46)

10(15.87)

 

10(29.40)

9(26.50)

 

Category of institutions

Community Health Center (station)

18(28.60)

17(27.00)

0.84

8(23.50)

7(20.60)

0.77

Township primary health institutions

45(71.40)

46(73.00)

 

26(76.50)

27(79.40)

 

The number of staff

56.37 ± 45.07

43.98 ± 28.21

0.07

51.15 ± 38.05

41.24 ± 28.68

0.23

The number of outpatients and emergency patients

22731.16 ± 18330.00

21039.6 ± 25185.96

0.67

23201.76 ± 20435.07

19654.26 ± 17183.63

0.44

The medical income (ten thousands Yuan)

156.62 ± 156.64

100.2 ± 115.21

0.02

142.16 ± 147.86

122.01 ± 110.25

0.53

The examination income (ten thousands Yuan)

24.88 ± 37.90

21.00 ± 40.79

0.58

34.43 ± 48.36

20.32 ± 25.21

0.14

The drug income (ten thousands Yuan)

99.69 ± 74.40

92.38 ± 166.95

0.73

101.451 ± 83.69

67.14 ± 57.57

0.053

The average salary of the staff (Yuan)

2117.37 ± 690.21

2619.69 ± 580.78

0.00

2486.08 ± 639.97

2498.22 ± 533.89

0.93

  1. Note: for continuous and categorical variables, mean ± standard deviation and Frequency (Percent) was used respectively. Differences between groups were tested by independent t test for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables. All p-values were two tailed. ”a” stands for Fisher’s exact probability for expected count less than 5.