Skip to main content

Table 4 Hospital administrators’ mean attitudes regarding cr (±standard deviation), by presence of cardiac rehabilitation program at the institution where they work

From: How do hospital administrators perceive cardiac rehabilitation in a publicly-funded health care system?

Item

CR program (n=93; 51.4%)

No CR (n=88; 48.6%)

Total (N=195)

1. CR programs provide benefits beyond what primary care providers can offer

4.39±0.75

4.77±5.68

4.55±3.88

2. CR programs promote sustained behavioural changes that improve their health outcomes

4.39±0.64

4.23±0.55

4.31±0.60

3. It is the hospitals’ responsibility to provide all eligible inpatients with the information they need to begin an outpatient CR program

4.33±0.91

4.13±0.84

4.22±0.88

4. The closest available CR program is of good quality

4.36±0.82

4.01±0.83

4.20±0.83††

5. The government should provide more funding for CR programs

4.24±0.82

3.85±0.85

4.04±0.84††

6. Ministry funding models are a financial disincentive to CR provision

3.31±1.08

3.37±1.06

3.33±1.05

7. It is likely that government funding for CR programs will be sustained over time

3.36±1.01

3.05±0.88

3.23±0.96†

8. We do not have enough space to run a CR program at my institution

2.36±1.33

3.49±1.28

2.90±1.40†††

9. CR services are generally one of the first programs to be cut-back when we make budget reductions

2.52±1.07

3.20±0.98

2.78±1.08†††

10. Patients and their families should be responsible for their own health behavior changes and risk reduction self-management post-hospitalization

2.43±1.09

2.72±1.09

2.58±1.09

11. Scarce healthcare dollars should not be spent on outpatient care at the expense of acute care

2.06±1.26

2.19±1.01

2.12±1.13

12. Healthcare providers on the cardiac floor have other more important clinical duties than to refer patients to CR

1.71±0.91

1.65±0.73

1.70±0.83

13. Provincial health insurance should not cover CR services for cardiac patients post-hospitalization

1.47±0.75

1.78±0.90

1.61±0.84†

14. I am skeptical about the benefits of CR programs

1.28±0.52

1.65±0.70

1.47±0.65†††

  1. Note: Items were scored on a scale from 1 ‘Strongly Disagree’ to 5 ‘Strongly Agree’.
  2. †††p=.001, ††p=.01, †p<.05.