Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jul 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Lucio Liberato|
|20 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Barosi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lionel Perrier|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Lucio Liberato|
|30 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Barosi|
|18 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lionel Perrier|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-82|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.