Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Lucio Liberato
20 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giovanni Barosi
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lionel Perrier
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Lucio Liberato
30 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giovanni Barosi
18 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lionel Perrier
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-82

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement