Skip to main content

Table 2 Base-case cumulative virological response and HBV resistance probabilities for each rescue therapy

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of different rescue therapies in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B in China

Rescue therapy

HBeAg (+)

 

BeAg (−)

 

Source

 

Cumulative virological response (%)

Cumulative resistance (%)

Cumulative virological response (%)

Cumulative resistance (%)

 

ADV monotherapy

1st year: 20.4

1st year: 1.6

1st year: 33.3

1st year: 0

[9]

 

2nd year: 33.2

2nd year: 20.7

2nd year: 44.0

2nd year: 16.9

[9]

 

3rd year: 38.8

3rd year: 39.5

3rd year: 47.5

3rd year: 31.4

[9]

 

4th year: 41.2

4th year: 51.6

4th year: 51.0

4th year: 42.4

[9]

ADV and LAM combination therapy

1st year: 47.0

1st year: 1.0

1st year: 60.0

1st year: 1.0

[29, 30]

 

2nd year: 68.0

2nd year: 1.0

2nd year: 76.0

2nd year: 1.0

[29, 30]

  

3rd year: 1.0

3rd year: 97.0

3rd year: 1.0

[29, 30]

  

4th year: 8.0

 

4th year: 8.0

[29]

ETV monotherapy§

1st year: 21.0

1st year: 1.0

1st year: 21.0

1st year: 1.0

[18, 20, 23]

 

2nd year: 39.5

2nd year: 10.9

2nd year: 39.5

2nd year: 10.9

[18, 20, 23]

  

3rd year: 25.2

 

3rd year: 25.2

[18, 20, 23]

  

4th year: 36.4

 

4th year: 36.4

[18, 20, 23]

TDF monotherapy§

1st year: 45.8

1st year: 1.0

1st year: 45.8

1st year: 1.0

[22]

 

2nd year: 64.4

2nd year: 2.0

2nd year: 64.4

2nd year: 2.0

[22]

  1. §No separate data for HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(−) cohorts were reported; we assumed that the response and resistant data were similar for both cohorts.