Skip to main content

Table 2 Results: Scenario L vs Scenario T

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of timely dialysis referral after renal transplant failure in Spain

 

Scenario L

Scenario T

Comparative

Deterministic analysis

   

Per-patient annual cost

5,793 €

6,217 €

425 €

Per-patient annual cost (discount rate 3 %)

4,564 €

4,775 €

211 €

Per-patient annual QALY

0.2250

0.243

0.0176

Per-patient annual QALY (discount rate 3 %)

0.1594

0.1682

0.0087

ICER

  

24,135 €

ICER (discount rate: 3 %)

  

24,390 €

Probabilistic analysis (3 % discount rate)

   

Per-patient annual cost (95 % confidence interval)

4,591 € (3,926 €; 5,422 €)

4,771 € (4,073 €; 5,630 €)

180 € (−898 €; 1,305 €)

Per-patient annual QALY (95 % confidence interval)

0.1594 (0.1372; 0.1815)

0.1682 (0.1446; 0.1947)

0.0088 (−0.0245; 0.0431)

Dominant

20.20 %

27.80 %

7.60 %

Efficient (higher effectiveness)

3.20 %

27.60 %

24.40 %

Efficient (lower cost)

14.70 %

6.50 %

−8.20 %

Acceptable

38.10 %

61.90 %

23.80 %

Acceptable (without loss of effectiveness)

29.90 %

70.10 %

40.20 %

  1. ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.