Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “I know it’s bad for me and yet I do it”: exploring the factors that perpetuate smoking in Aboriginal Health Workers - a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Guydish
17 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penelope Abbott
8 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Dawson
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penelope Abbott
24 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Guydish
30 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Dawson
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Dawson
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-102

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement