Table 5 Differences between the conventional and the optimized 2SFCA methods
Bandwidth | Â | t-test | Percentiles | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Mean | p-value | 5% | 10% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 90% | 95% |
500 m | 1.21 | 0.004 | -8.25 | -4.31 | -1.03 | 1.02 | 3.74 | 7.53 | 10.55 |
1 Km | 1.56 | <.0001 | -4.05 | -2.06 | 0.09 | 1.68 | 3.45 | 5.42 | 7.55 |
2 Km | 14.56 | <.0001 | -1.97 | 2.12 | 6.65 | 13.85 | 22.25 | 30.09 | 33.95 |
3 Km | 1.82 | <.0001 | -9.62 | -6.98 | -3.49 | 2.45 | 7.20 | 12.51 | 14.22 |