Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost effectiveness of ulcerative colitis treatment in Germany: a comparison of two oral formulations of mesalazine

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Laszlo Lakatos
12 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cosimo Prantera
31 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Prenzler
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Laszlo Lakatos
18 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cosimo Prantera
29 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Prenzler
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Prenzler
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Prenzler
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Prenzler
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
5 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
5 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-157

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement