Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds-ratios for the associations between organizational factors and clinical integration in the Danish healthcare system

From: Is the Kaiser Permanente model superior in terms of clinical integration?: a comparative study of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California and the Danish healthcare system

 

Odds-ratio

95% CI

p-value

FDR p-value**

Sex

    

Female

1.00

Reference

  

Male

1.12

(0.74, 1.70)

0.60

0.84

Working hours*

    

Full-time

1.00

Reference

  

Part-time

0.86

(0.48, 1.53)

0.60

0.84

Years experience

1.01

(0.99, 1.03)

0.46

0.84

Support staff

    

0 professions

1.00

Reference

  

1 professions

1.32

(0.28, 6.19)

0.73

0.84

2 professions

0.78

(0.16, 3.71)

0.73

0.84

3 professions

0.65

(0.13, 3.29)

0.60

0.84

4 professions

1.40

(0.15, 12.76)

0.77

0.84

Available health information technology (HIT)

  

Limited

1.00

Reference

  

Some

0.68

(0.42, 1.09)

0.11

0.84

Extensive

0.92

(0.46, 1.84)

0.81

0.84

Practice type

    

Company

1.00

Reference

  

Group

1.25

(0.63, 2.49)

0.52

0.84

Solo

0.94

(0.53, 1.68)

0.84

0.84

Number of patients***

1.00

(1.00, 1.00)

0.48

0.84

  1. * In KPNC full-time is at least 40 working hours per week and in DHS at least 37 working hours per week. Part-time is below 40 hours per week in KPNC and below 37 hours per week in DHS
  2. ** p-values, which are corrected for multiple testing. The correction procedure is based on a 5% false-discovery rate
  3. *** Every incremental step of 1 reflects 100 patients