Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validation of the PHQ-9 as a screening instrument for depression in diabetes patients in specialized outpatient clinics

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Schulz
2 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten van Steenbergen-Weijenburg
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten van Steenbergen-Weijenburg
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten van Steenbergen-Weijenburg
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten van Steenbergen-Weijenburg
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Aug 2010 Editorially accepted
12 Aug 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-235

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement