Table 3 Discrete choice model results and marginal effects by perspective
From: Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment
Perspectives | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Policy makers | People living with HIV/AIDS | Village Health Volunteers | |||||||||||
Criteria | Levels | Coefficient (95% CI) | (p-value) | Marginal effect | Coefficient (95% CI) | (p-value) | Marginal effect | Coefficient (95% CI) | (p-value) | Marginal effect | |||
Target group | Child | ||||||||||||
Teen | 1.049* | (0.001) | 0.183 | 0.135 | (0.385) | 0.030 | 0.830* | (0.000) | 0.181 | ||||
(0.445, 1.654) | (-0.169, 0.440) | (0.464, 1.196) | |||||||||||
HiRrisk | 1.153* | (0.001) | 0.199 | 0.022 | (0.900) | 0.005 | 0.314 | (0.142) | 0.069 | ||||
(0.502, 1.803) | (-0.323, 0.368) | (-0.105, 0.734) | |||||||||||
Adults | 0.023 | (0.926) | 0.004 | -0.279 | (0.065) | -0.061 | -0.249 | (0.176) | -0.054 | ||||
(-0.470, 0.517) | (-0.575, 0.017) | (-0.609, 0.112) | |||||||||||
Gender of target group | Male | ||||||||||||
Female | -0.256 | (0.321) | -0.043 | 0.082 | (0.544) | 0.018 | 0.196 | (0.229) | 0.043 | ||||
(-0.762, 0.250) | (-0.184, 0.348) | (-0.123, 0.514) | |||||||||||
BothGen | 0.266 | (0.189) | 0.045 | 1.132* | (0.000) | 0.255 | 0.724* | (0.000) | 0.161 | ||||
(-0.131, 0.663) | (0.911, 1.354) | (0.458, 0.990) | |||||||||||
Type of intervention | HIV | ||||||||||||
AIDS | -0.493* | (0.019) | -0.088 | 1.091* | (0.000) | 0.245 | -0.476* | (0.001) | -0.105 | ||||
(-0.904, -0.081) | (0.869, 1.313) | (-0.744, -0.208) | |||||||||||
Prevent | 1.967* | (0.000) | 0.333 | 0.212 | (0.116) | 0.047 | 0.246 | (0.137) | 0.054 | ||||
(1.450, 2.485) | (-0.052, 0.476) | (-0.078, 0.569) | |||||||||||
Effectiveness | LoEff | ||||||||||||
HiEff | 1.983* | (0.000) | 0.385 | 0.627* | (0.000) | 0.140 | 1.185* | (0.000) | 0.275 | ||||
(1.643, 2.323) | (0.454, 0.800) | (0.973, 1.395) | |||||||||||
Quality of evidence | Weak | ||||||||||||
on effectiveness | Strong | 1.310* | (0.000) | 0.237 | 0.356* | (0.000) | 0.079 | 0.349* | (0.001) | 0.077 | |||
(0.976, 1.645) | (0.183, 0.528) | (0.139, 0.560) | |||||||||||
Log likelihood | -424.4532 | -1434.3323 | -963.3818 | ||||||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.2747 | 0.0992 | 0.0984 | ||||||||||
Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square (p-value) | 1.36 (0.995) | 2.79 (0.947) | 1.87 (0.985) | ||||||||||